The trading journal everyone skips, and the reason nothing improves
A journal that fills itself: import executions from your broker, tag the setup and the mistake, and let the numbers tell you which parts of your playbook actually earn. Those numbers become the radar's thresholds.
Your parabolic fades lose money at 38% and you take them most often after a losing morning. Every one this month was outside the playbook.
- Win rate, expectancy and average R by setup, side and session
- Efficiency: how much of the available move you captured
- Mistake tagging: chased entry, sized too big, outside plan, revenge trade
- A coach that reads the log and tells you the uncomfortable pattern
It closes the loop
Expectancy per setup is not a vanity statistic. It feeds back into which preconditions you arm on the radar, so the board that surfaces names tomorrow is tuned by what actually worked for you, not by what works on average for everyone.
Mistakes are a first-class field
Chased entry, no hard stop, sized too big, revenge trade, held loser, cut winner early, outside plan. Tagging them turns a vague sense that you are undisciplined into a count you can watch fall.
The coach is blunt by design
It reads the log and says the thing: that your parabolic fades lose money at 38%, that you take them most often after a losing morning, and that every one this month was outside the playbook. Bluntness is configurable. Most people set it high, then turn it down.
The founding cohort is 1,000 seats.
We admit 1,000 traders at a time because that is the largest number whose feedback on radar accuracy we can actually work through before opening the next batch. Applications are admitted in order; the intake asks what you trade, and answering it moves you up.
No card at application. Founding price locked for the life of your account. The full intake asks what you trade and moves you up the queue.
Admitted in order of application · momentum traders who complete the intake go first · founding price locked for the life of your account